top of page

Spirtual Common Sense Real Talk

Public·135 members


Download File

Inspiration porn is the portrayal of people with disabilities (or other uncommon life circumstances) as being inspirational to able-bodied people (or other common reference group), on the basis of their life circumstances.[1] The term "inspiration porn" is by analogy with pornography, in that the material is perceived as objectifying disabled people for the benefit or gratification of the able-bodied.[2][3] Inspiration porn is a form of ableism.[4] An example of inspiration porn might be photo of a child with a disability taking part in an ordinary activity, with captions targeted towards able-bodied people such as "your excuse is invalid", "before you quit, try" or "they didn't let their disability stop them".[1]

The term was coined in 2012 by disability rights activist Stella Young in an editorial in Australian Broadcasting Corporation's webzine Ramp Up[5] and further explored in her TEDx Talk.[6] About her decisions in naming inspiration porn, Young stated: "I use the term porn deliberately because of the objectification of one group of people for the benefit of another group of people."[2] She rejected the idea that disabled people's otherwise ordinary activities should be considered extraordinary solely because of disability.[1]

Criticisms of inspiration porn include that it "others" disabled people, that it portrays disability as a burden (as opposed to focusing on the societal obstacles that disabled people face), and that reducing disabled people to inspirations dehumanizes them,[7][8] and makes them exceptionalist examples.[9] Inspiration porn itself reinforces the stereotypes society has given disabled individuals that they are unable and less competent than those who do not have disabilities. After watching a 2016 advertisement titled We're the Superhumans from the Summer Paralympics in Rio de Janeiro, which showed a variety of disabled people accomplishing tasks in athletics, music, the household, and more alongside the repeated message of "Yes I can", a response group of disabled viewers felt it generally exploited disabled people for the pleasure and comfort of the non-disabled.[10]

In 2014, disabled actress Amelia Cavallo described inspiration porn imagery as being "the visualization of disabled people overcoming what seem like broken and substandard bodies, sensory and cognitive make ups" to make "the non-disabled public feel good about their unbroken, able bodies, senses, and cognition."[11] Forms of inspiration porn ostracize individuals and reduce their identity to be solely their disability. The focus on a single narrative, that disabled persons are always inspirational, contributes to a lack of accurate understandings of disability identities and to a widespread, unrealistic expectation of heroism for disabled people to live up to.[12]

The Cripple punk movement, established in 2014, directly opposes the portrayal of disabled people as inspiration porn by refusing to conform to normative aesthetic and moral standards, not needing to be 'good' to deserve the conditional support of able-bodied people, and reclaiming the slang crip.

The 2016 TV show Speechless explored the concept in an episode where it explains inspiration porn as "portrayal of people with disabilities as one-dimensional saints who only exist to warm the hearts and open the minds of able-bodied people."[13]

Hilary Hughes of Entertainment Weekly criticized the album for the 2021 film Music, writing that the lyrical theme of "motivational language" flies "dangerously close to inspiration porn".[15]

18 U.S.C. 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children(Production of child pornography)18 U.S.C. 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children18 U.S.C. 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors(Possession, distribution and receipt of child pornography)18 U.S.C. 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography18 U.S.C. 2256- Definitions18 U.S.C. 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States

Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law.

Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal.

Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child pornography using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. 2251; 18 U.S.C. 2252; 18 U.S.C. 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child pornography offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law.

Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child pornography offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child pornography across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child pornography violation. Even if the child pornography image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.

In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child pornography.

Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child pornography with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States.

Any violation of federal child pornography law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child pornography under 18 U.S.C. 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child pornography in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child pornography offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment.

As the old saying goes, "there's a first time for everything", so why not catch deliciously curvy babes having their first sexual encounter right here on Amateur porn never looked as good and our bevy of natural beauties will dazzle you in full-length erotic scenes. Witness reality sex videos bursting with luscious 18+ vixens that crave a monster cock in every tight orifice. Their libidos are raging like an uncontrollable wildfire. So get a front row seat to all of their carnal adventures in HD! RK is the home to voluptuous jezebels of all shapes and sizes. There is definitely something for every fan of excellent XXX content. The biggest dicks break in amateurs gone wild is a sizzling sight to see as you can experience every sexy milestone as our scrumptious newbies in the adult biz. Some of our daring divas swing both ways and enjoy a romp with a lascivious lesbian who loves to show her wet pussy off. The muff diving on RK is divine, as is our deep throat blowjobs, tit fucking and deep anal penetrations. Nothing is off limits on our premium site and our homemade porn reveals everything in stunning detail. Reality Kings has gathered the most hardcore ever caught on camera. So what are you waiting for Become a member today and feast your eyes on bashful novices quickly transforming into seasoned starlets.

It is one of the most common sexual challenges men face and can be very distressing. Some people, particularly those who have religious or moral qualms about pornography, argue that porn use can cause erectile dysfunction.

Some proponents of the notion, such as this highly subjective blog from anti-pornography advocacy group Fight the New Drug, believe that pornography is immoral. This potentially makes their research more biased than a laboratory study from a neutral party.

A 2015 analysis of two large, cross-sectional studies also points to a link between pornography use and ED. The link in that study, however, was very modest. Just one of the two studies found a link, and that link was weak. 59ce067264


Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...


bottom of page